![]() You also don’t want Nightshade when you’re trying to keep Night Owl cloaked, and so they don’t play well together in decks. You don’t want Night Owl in games where the opponent is rushing and you need something down on T2. Night Owl is more efficient, but also more vulnerable and slower. I generally consider both very strong cards, with slightly different advantages. I think this needs some mentioning because many excellent Serena decks use Night Owl instead. The key is a lot of excellent utility cards combined with a strong (for Serena) early game, and support cards aimed at sustaining the deck into the late game. ![]() It has its share of weak matchups, but they’re usually slightly weak, and not auto-losses. What’s so special about this deck? It essentially is a broad toolbox for Serena, with potential answers in small amounts to a wide array of decks and play-styles. Sometimes we can just improve it or adapt it to fit ourselves and our situations. We don’t need to always reinvent the wheel. In my opinion, there’s no shame in copying, as long as you give credit where it’s due. At this point it has morphed a few times, and while all the cards are commonly used Serena cards, I like to think that I’ve made it my own. ![]() But in truth, it is a net-deck – well actually an adaptation of a deck that I already posted here (if others copy it, it becomes a net-deck, right?), which was loosely based off of watching BP Chamthabo play his excellent Serena deck (before he posted it). It also got me to a ranking of 324 in QM (though I’ve dropped a bit) and earned me the top place in both days of the Europe/Africa Regional Championship (2014). This deck has earned me high praise like “nice net-deck” and “looks more like just another player with a common meta deck”. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |